An Academic Exploration of the Book of Enoch: Content, Influence, and Canonical Status

I. An Introduction to the Enochic Corpus: Composition and Distinctions

To understand the Enochic tradition, one must first appreciate the distinct components that constitute 1 Enoch. These five books, each with its own focus and style, provide the thematic foundation for the entire work 1:

• The Book of the Watchers (Chapters 1–36): This is perhaps the most famous section, detailing the cosmic transgression of a group of angels known as the Watchers. It narrates their descent to earth, their illicit union with human women, the subsequent birth of the giant Nephilim, and Enoch’s heavenly journeys where he witnesses the places of judgment prepared for both fallen angels and wicked souls.¹
• The Book of Parables (or Similitudes) (Chapters 37–71): This section is profoundly eschatological, focusing on the themes of divine judgment, the coming Messianic kingdom, and the fate of kings and rulers who oppress the righteous. Crucially, it introduces a pre-existent, heavenly messianic figure identified by the title “the Son of Man”.¹
• The Astronomical Book (or Book of Heavenly Luminaries) (Chapters 72–82): Presented as a revelation from the angel Uriel, this book provides Enoch with detailed knowledge of celestial mechanics. It describes the movements of the sun, moon, and stars, and advocates for a 364-day solar calendar, a point of major sectarian debate as it stood in contrast to the lunar calendar predominantly used in Second Temple Judaism.¹
• The Book of Dream Visions (Chapters 83–90): This section contains two apocalyptic visions received by Enoch in his youth. The first foretells the Great Flood. The known as the “Animal Apocalypse,” presents a sweeping, allegorical history of Israel from creation to the final judgment, with different nations and figures represented by various animals and shepherds.¹
• The Epistle of Enoch (Chapters 91–108): This final part is a collection of exhortations, wisdom teachings, and prophecies delivered by Enoch to his children before his final ascent. It contains warnings to sinners and encouragement to the righteous, promising vindication and reward after a period of great tribulation, and concludes with a narrative about the miraculous birth of Noah.¹

Further complicating the landscape are two other, entirely separate works also attributed to Enoch: 2 Enoch and 3 Enoch.

• 2 Enoch (Slavonic Enoch): This text, which survives primarily in Old Church Slavonic, is also known as The Book of the Secrets of Enoch. It recounts Enoch’s guided journey through a ten-tiered heaven, his face-to-face encounter with God, and his subsequent transformation into a glorious angelic being.⁶ Its cosmology is distinct from 1 Enoch, and it contains unique ethical teachings emphasizing love for all living things, as well as a concluding section that narrates the miraculous priestly lineage culminating in Melchizedek.⁶
• 3 Enoch (Hebrew Enoch): This much later work belongs to the Jewish mystical tradition of Merkabah (“chariot”) mysticism. It describes the ascent of the 2nd-century CE sage Rabbi Ishmael to the heavenly palaces, where he encounters the supreme angel Metatron. This exalted being reveals that he was once the mortal Enoch, taken from the earth and transformed by God into a celestial scribe and viceroy, the “Lesser YHWH”.⁸

The existence of these three major, distinct works demonstrates that the figure of Enoch, whose mysterious departure in Genesis (“God took him”) left a narrative void, became an ideal vessel for esoteric revelation.¹¹ The diversity of content across these texts—from angelology and calendrical science in 1 Enoch to cosmology in 2 Enoch and high mysticism in 3 Enoch—suggests that “Enoch” functioned less as a single author and more as a literary figurehead. This allowed various Jewish communities in the Second Temple and early Rabbinic periods to explore powerful theological questions not fully addressed in the proto-canonical scriptures, such as the intricate problem of evil, the structure of the cosmos, the nature of the afterlife, and the mechanics of divine judgment. The Enochic corpus is therefore best understood not merely as a set of books, but as a distinct literary genre of revelation, reflecting the vibrant and speculative theological landscape of its time.

Text	Also Known As	Probable Original Language	Surviving Language(s)	Approximate Date of Composition	Key Themes
1 Enoch	Ethiopic Enoch	Aramaic, Hebrew	Ge’ez (complete), Aramaic & Greek (fragments)	3rd Century BCE – 1st Century CE	Fallen angels (Watchers), Nephilim, Son of Man, eschatology, judgment, solar calendar
2 Enoch	Slavonic Enoch, Secrets of Enoch	Greek (from a Semitic original)	Old Church Slavonic, Coptic (fragments)	Late 1st Century CE	Ascent through ten heavens, angelic transformation, cosmology, Melchizedek’s priesthood
3 Enoch	Hebrew Enoch, Book of Palaces	Hebrew	Hebrew	5th – 6th Century CE	Merkabah mysticism, Rabbi Ishmael’s ascent, Enoch’s transformation into the angel Metatron

II. Authorship, Provenance, and the Significance of the Dead Sea Scrolls

A foundational point of scholarly consensus regarding the Book of Enoch is its pseudepigraphal nature. The work is attributed to the biblical patriarch Enoch, the great-grandfather of Noah, but it was not written by him.² The historical Enoch lived in the antediluvian period (Genesis 5:21-24), thousands of years before these texts were composed. The attribution of authorship to a revered ancient figure was a common literary convention in antiquity, employed not necessarily to deceive but to lend authority and prestige to a text by connecting it to a foundational figure from the past.¹¹

Modern scholarship universally agrees that 1 Enoch is a composite work, a library of texts penned by multiple anonymous Jewish authors over a long period.² This process of composition and redaction spanned several centuries, with the earliest sections, such as the Astronomical Book and the Book of the Watchers, dating to the 3rd century BCE or even earlier.² Other parts were added over time, with the Book of Parables widely considered the latest section, likely composed in the late 1st century BCE or the 1st century CE.⁴ The original language of these texts was Semitic; the oldest parts were almost written in Aramaic, with some portions possibly in Hebrew.⁴ These original texts were later translated into Greek, and it is from a Greek version that the complete Ethiopic (Ge’ez) translation—the only full version to survive—was made.⁴

For centuries, the study of Enoch in the West relied on this Ethiopic version, which was “rediscovered” and brought to Europe by the Scottish traveler James Bruce in 1773.⁴ But the academic understanding of the book was revolutionized in the mid-20th century with the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Among the texts found in the caves at Qumran were numerous fragments of 1 Enoch written in its original Aramaic.²

The significance of this discovery cannot be overstated. These fragments, which were scientifically dated as far back as the 3rd century BCE, provided incontrovertible physical evidence of the book’s great antiquity and its pre-Christian origins.² This definitively put to rest any lingering speculation that the book might have been a later Christian creation and firmly established it as a product of Second Temple Judaism.¹⁸ The presence of these scrolls at Qumran demonstrates that 1 Enoch was known, read, and valued by sectarian Jewish communities like the Essenes long before the time of Christ. Intriguingly, fragments from every major section of 1 Enoch were found except for the Book of Parables.⁴ This absence has fueled a long-standing and vigorous scholarly debate regarding the date, provenance, and circulation of that particular section.¹⁹

Before the discovery at Qumran, the influence of Enoch on the New Testament was a matter of literary conjecture based on the later Ethiopic text. The Dead Sea Scrolls, But act as a historical and textual bridge, transforming the nature of this inquiry. They provide concrete, datable proof that Aramaic versions of Enochic literature were circulating in Judea centuries before the birth of Jesus and the apostles. This physical evidence makes the connection undeniable. The question is no longer if the New Testament authors could have known these traditions, but rather how they engaged with a body of literature that was demonstrably part of their immediate religious and cultural landscape. The scrolls ground the Book of Enoch firmly in the soil from which early Christianity grew, making the study of its influence not merely a literary exercise but a historical necessity for understanding the intellectual and theological world of the New Testament.

III. The Book of the Watchers: Angelology, the Nephilim, and the Origin of Evil

The first major section of 1 Enoch, the Book of the Watchers (chapters 1-36), presents one of ancient Judaism’s most elaborate and influential attempts to grapple with the problem of evil. It offers a detailed narrative that expands dramatically upon the cryptic passage in Genesis 6:1-4 concerning the “sons of God” and the “daughters of men.”

The story begins with a cosmic rebellion. A group of 200 celestial beings known as the Watchers, stationed to oversee humanity, become consumed with lust for human women. Led by their chiefs, Semjaza and Azazel, they descend to the summit of Mount Hermon and swear a binding oath to defy God’s order and take human wives for themselves.⁷ This act of transgression is not merely one of lust but a powerful violation of the created boundaries between the heavenly and earthly realms.

The offspring of these illicit unions were the Nephilim, a race of monstrous giants who brought chaos and violence to the world.¹ Possessing a voracious appetite, they devoured all of humanity’s labor and resources. When that was not enough, they turned on humans themselves, and eventually on the animal kingdom and each other, filling the earth with bloodshed and lawlessness.²⁰

The Watchers’ sin was compounded by their transmission of forbidden knowledge, which further corrupted humanity. This was not merely the sharing of wisdom but the revelation of arts and sciences that led humanity away from God and into sin.²⁰ Azazel, for instance, taught the art of metallurgy—the fashioning of swords, knives, and breastplates—which fueled warfare. He also taught the making of cosmetics and adornments, which promoted vanity and sexual immorality.²¹ Semjaza taught the arts of sorcery and spell-casting, while other angels revealed the secrets of astrology and divination.²⁰ These teachings were considered corrupting because they were unauthorized and directed human trust toward created things and occult powers rather than toward God.

Crucially, the Book of the Watchers provides a specific and powerful etiology for the origin of demons. The canonical book of Genesis is largely silent on this matter. 1 Enoch explains that when the giant Nephilim were killed, their physical bodies perished, but because they were of a hybrid, spiritual-physical nature, their disembodied spirits were destined to remain on earth.¹² These wandering, malevolent spirits are the demons that afflict, corrupt, and lead humanity astray until the final judgment.²³ This explanation became profoundly influential in the development of both Jewish and early Christian demonology.

The narrative arc culminates in divine judgment. The cries of oppressed humanity reach heaven, prompting the archangels—Michael, Uriel, Raphael, and Gabriel—to appeal to God. In response, God dispatches them to execute His sentence. The fallen Watchers are to be bound hand and foot and cast into a desolate, fiery abyss (identified as Tartarus), where they will remain imprisoned until the Day of Judgment.¹² The archangel Gabriel is sent to incite the giants to destroy one another, and Uriel is sent to warn Noah of the impending Deluge, which will cleanse the earth of the Nephilim and the pervasive corruption they and their fathers unleashed.²⁰

This powerful narrative from Enoch can be understood as a form of theological polemic. The account of sin in Genesis 3 places the responsibility for humanity’s fall squarely on human disobedience: the free choice of Adam and Eve. The Book of the Watchers, in contrast, presents a complementary, if not competing, theodicy. It argues that the extreme wickedness of the antediluvian world was not merely a human problem but was instigated and catastrophically amplified by a cosmic, angelic rebellion.²¹ While this provided a compelling explanation for the overwhelming presence of evil and offered a mythic backstory to the enigmatic verses of Genesis 6, it also created a powerful theological tension that would contribute to its eventual exclusion from the major biblical canons. By tracing the primary source of widespread evil to angelic interference, the narrative could be interpreted as diminishing the concepts of human culpability and free will, which became foundational pillars of both Rabbinic Jewish and orthodox Christian anthropology.²⁴ This clash of theologies—one centered on human choice, the other on supernatural corruption—is key to understanding the book’s controversial and contested legacy.

IV. The Son of Man in the Parables of Enoch and New Testament Christology

The second major section of 1 Enoch, the Book of Parables or Similitudes (chapters 37-71), contains what is arguably the book’s most major contribution to the history of religious thought: the depiction of a transcendent, pre-existent messianic figure called the “Son of Man.” This concept has powerful implications for understanding the Christology of the New Testament.

The Son of Man in the Parables is a layered figure, described with a cluster of exalted titles and attributes that paint a picture of a divine savior and judge.²⁶ He is referred to not only as the “Son of Man” but also as the “Righteous One,” the “Elect One” (or Chosen One), and the “Anointed One” (Messiah).²⁶ The imagery used to describe him clearly draws from and dramatically expands upon the vision of the “one like a son of man” in Daniel 7:13-14. While Daniel’s figure is enigmatic, Enoch’s Son of Man is a fully developed character with specific roles:

• Pre-existence: The Parables state unequivocally that this figure existed before the creation of the world. His name was “named before the Lord of Spirits” even “before the sun and the signs were created”.²⁷ He was “chosen and hidden before Him, before the creation of the world and for evermore”.²⁷ This language points not merely to a predestined role but to a form of personal, heavenly pre-existence.
• Eschatological Judge: He is the ultimate agent of God’s judgment. He will be seated upon a “throne of glory,” a phrase echoed in the Gospels, from which he will “depose the kings from their thrones and kingdoms” and judge the secrets of all humanity.²⁷
• Savior of the Righteous: His role is not only judicial but also soteriological. He is described as a “staff for the righteous ones,” a “light of the gentiles,” and the hope of the afflicted. Crucially, the righteous “are saved in his name,” and all who dwell on earth will ultimately “fall down and worship before him”.²⁷

The most dramatic and theologically contentious moment in the Parables arrives in its final chapter. After being shown these visions, the patriarch Enoch is taken into the highest heaven and is himself identified as this very Son of Man. An angel greets him with the stunning declaration: “You are that Son of Man who was born for righteousness” (1 Enoch 71:14).¹⁵ While older English translations sometimes obscured this point, modern scholarly consensus, based on the manuscript evidence, affirms that the text identifies Enoch as the heavenly Son of Man.²⁶

This identification creates a fascinating paradox for Christian theology, positioning the Book of Parables as both a vital bridge and an insurmountable barrier. The understanding of this paradox has been reshaped by what scholars call a “paradigm shift” in the dating of this section.²⁹ For many years, it was assumed to be a post-Christian work, possibly influenced by the Gospels. But a strong scholarly consensus now dates the Parables to the pre-Christian era, likely the late 1st century BCE or early 1st century CE.¹⁵

This revised dating makes the Parables an essential bridge for understanding the New Testament. It demonstrates that a sophisticated concept of a pre-existent, heavenly, judging, and saving Son of Man was already circulating within some Jewish circles before or during the ministry of Jesus. This provides a powerful and immediate Jewish context for Jesus’s frequent self-designation as “the Son of Man,” showing that the title was not a novel invention of the early church but one with deep roots in Jewish apocalyptic expectation.²⁸

At the same time, the Parables‘ ultimate conclusion presents a theological barrier. By identifying Enoch as the Son of Man, the text offers a messianic candidate who is not Jesus of Nazareth.²⁶ This creates a direct and irreconcilable conflict with the foundational kerygma of Christianity. Therefore, the Book of Parables stands as an indispensable resource for grasping the conceptual world behind the most common title Jesus used for himself. Yet, its specific claims are, from a Christian standpoint, fundamentally heterodox.²⁶ It represents a stream of messianic thought that ran parallel to, but was ultimately distinct from, the one that flowed into orthodox Christology, explaining both its powerful influence on and its necessary rejection by the early Church.

V. The Influence of Enoch on the New Testament

The Book of Enoch’s impact on the thought and literature of the New Testament is extensive, ranging from direct quotation to a deep saturation of themes, concepts, and vocabulary. This influence demonstrates that the Enochic traditions were a major part of the intellectual and religious environment in which the first Christians lived, preached, and wrote.

The most explicit and undeniable link is found in the Epistle of Jude. In verses 14-15, the author directly quotes from 1 Enoch 1:9, a prophecy of the Lord’s coming in judgment: “It was also about these that Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied, saying, ‘Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of his holy ones, to execute judgment on all, and to convict all the ungodly…’”.⁴ Jude not only quotes the text but attributes it to the historical Enoch, using the verb “prophesied,” which indicates that he and his audience considered this specific utterance to be a true and authoritative word from God.³¹ This direct citation is the clearest evidence that 1 Enoch was held in high regard in at least some early Christian circles.³¹

A closely related point of influence is the Epistle of 2 Peter. Chapter 2 of this letter shares a remarkable amount of thematic material with Jude, particularly in its condemnation of false teachers and its use of examples of divine judgment. Specifically, 2 Peter 2:4 states that “God did not spare the angels when they sinned, but cast them into Tartarus and committed them to pits of deepest darkness to be kept until the judgment”.⁴ This is a clear and powerful allusion to the central narrative of the Book of the Watchers, which describes the binding and imprisonment of the fallen angels in a fiery abyss.⁴ The strong parallels between Jude and 2 Peter are widely believed by scholars to stem from their mutual reliance on this shared body of Enochic and other apocalyptic traditions.³³

Beyond these well-known instances, the influence of Enoch permeates the New Testament in more subtle but equally major ways. Scholars have identified numerous thematic and verbal parallels that suggest a deep familiarity with Enochic ideas.³⁴

New Testament Passage	Key Phrase/Concept	Parallel Passage in 1 Enoch	Thematic Connection
Matthew 5:5	“Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.”	1 Enoch 5:7	“The elect shall… inherit the earth.”
Luke 6:24	“Woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation.”	1 Enoch 94:8	“Woe to you who are rich, for in your riches have you trusted…”
Matthew 19:28	“…you also will sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.”	1 Enoch 108:12	“I will place each of them on a throne of glory…”
Luke 16:26	“…between us and you a great chasm has been fixed…”	1 Enoch 22:9-11	“…by a chasm \[are\] their souls are separated.”
John 12:36	“…that you may become sons of light.”	1 Enoch 108:11	“…the good from the generation of light.”

Foundational New Testament concepts such as the messianic “Son of Man,” the nature of the final judgment, the resurrection, and the “eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels” (Matthew 25:41) all have strong precedents and detailed elaborations in the Book of Enoch.⁴

This widespread evidence suggests that the Book of Enoch should be viewed as part of the “mental furniture” of the New Testament world. The use of its language and concepts does not necessarily mean the biblical authors considered the entire work to be canonical Scripture, just as St. Paul’s quotation of pagan Greek poets in Athens did not canonize their works.¹³ Rather, it indicates that Enochic ideas formed a shared cultural and theological reservoir. These were the stories, apocalyptic frameworks, and symbolic language that were “in the air,” familiar to both the writers and their audiences. Reading the New Testament without an awareness of this Enochic background is to miss a major layer of its conceptual context. The book provided a rich vocabulary and a set of powerful symbols for articulating beliefs about eschatology, angelology, and divine justice, which the New Testament authors could then readily adapt and redeploy for their own uniquely Christ-centered theological purposes.

VI. Reception and Rejection in the Early Church: The Patristic Witness

The trajectory of the Book of Enoch’s reception in the early Church is a telling narrative of shifting theological priorities, moving from a position of high esteem in the second and third centuries to one of skepticism and eventual rejection by the fourth and fifth centuries in the Latin West. This evolution mirrors the Church’s own journey toward a consolidated canon and a more systematized theology.

In the early post-apostolic period, 1 Enoch was widely read and frequently treated as an authoritative, if not fully canonical, text by several prominent Church Fathers.³⁵ The anonymous author of the Epistle of Barnabas (c. 70-132 AD) twice cites the book as Scripture.³⁵ Major figures like Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130-202 AD), Clement of Alexandria (c. 150-215 AD), and Origen (c. 184-253 AD) were all familiar with the work and appear to have accepted it as a genuine writing of the patriarch Enoch.³⁵ Irenaeus, for example, affirmed the Enochic account of the commingling of angels and women and Enoch’s role as a heavenly mediator.³⁷

The most forceful patristic defender of 1 Enoch was Tertullian of Carthage (c. 155-220 AD). In his treatise On the Apparel of Women (De Cultu Feminarum), he mounts a detailed defense of the book’s authenticity and authority.³⁸ Aware that the book was “not received by some” because it was not in the Jewish canon, Tertullian offers two arguments for its preservation. He reasons that Noah, being Enoch’s great-grandson, would have heard and remembered the traditions of his ancestor and passed them down. Even if the original text had been destroyed in the Flood, Noah could have renewed it “under the Spirit’s inspiration,” just as Ezra was believed to have restored the Jewish scriptures after the Babylonian exile.³⁸ Tertullian makes the polemical claim that the Jews likely rejected the book precisely because it contained prophecies concerning Christ, whom they also rejected.³⁸ For Tertullian, the book’s testimony about fallen angels teaching women to use cosmetics was a valid scriptural basis for moral exhortation.⁴⁰

But by the fourth century, as the Church began to formally define the limits of the biblical canon, the tide turned against Enoch. The book’s more fantastical elements and theological idiosyncrasies became liabilities. Even Origen, who used the book, signaled an awareness of its contested status. In his Commentary on John, when referencing the Enochic story of the angels’ descent, he adds the important qualification, “…if any one cares to accept that book as sacred”.⁴¹ This indicates that by the mid-third century, its authority was no longer universally assumed.

The definitive rejection in the Latin West was solidified by the influential theologian, Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD). In his monumental work, The City of God, Augustine dismisses the Enochic narrative as an “apocryphal” “fable”.³² He found the story of angels and humans reproducing to be particularly troubling and sought to reinterpret the Genesis 6 passage to avoid such a reading.³⁷ Augustine acknowledged that the Epistle of Jude asserts that Enoch prophesied, but he argued that the writings attributed to him were rightly excluded from the canon for two primary reasons. Their “too great antiquity” made their authenticity suspect and impossible to verify. And more importantly, they contained “many false statements” that contradicted the truth found in the canonical books.³² Following the lead of Augustine and Jerome, who also labeled the book apocryphal, the Western Church largely set 1 Enoch aside, and it was eventually lost to Europe until the 18th century.²

This arc of reception is not arbitrary; it serves as a barometer of the early Church’s evolving theological concerns. In the second and third centuries, as the Church defined itself against Roman paganism, the Enochic story of fallen angels was a powerful polemical tool to explain the origin of idolatry and demonic influence.³⁷ In an era of fluid canonicity, its spiritual and moral utility was highly valued. By the fourth and fifth centuries, the Church’s focus had shifted inward to combating internal heresies and establishing doctrinal precision on core tenets like Christology and the nature of sin. In this new context, Enoch’s theological “jaggedness”—its angel-centric theodicy, its identification of a non-Jesus Son of Man, and its elaborate cosmology—became deeply problematic. The book’s journey from respected source to rejected apocryphon thus mirrors the Church’s own journey from a diverse apocalyptic movement to an imperial institution with a clearly defined canon and a systematically articulated orthodoxy.

VII. The Question of Canonicity: A Cross-Tradition Analysis

The canonical status of the Book of Enoch is one of the most frequently discussed aspects of the text, primarily because it highlights the different historical paths and theological criteria used by various faith traditions to define the boundaries of Scripture. The fact that four major traditions—Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism, and Ethiopian Orthodoxy—arrived at three different conclusions regarding 1 Enoch is a powerful illustration of the complex nature of canon formation.

Exclusion from the Jewish Canon (Tanakh):

The Book of Enoch was never accepted into the canon of the Hebrew Scriptures.¹³ The reasons for its rejection by the Pharisaic and later Rabbinic authorities who shaped normative Judaism are manifold. Theologically, key Enochic doctrines were deemed incompatible with emerging rabbinic orthodoxy. These included the explicit narrative of angels procreating with humans, the strong apocalyptic dualism, and the concept of angels possessing the free will to commit such sins, all of which were rejected in normative Judaism.³⁰ the book’s content, such as its advocacy for a solar calendar and its implicit critiques of the Temple priesthood, aligned it with sectarian movements, like the community at Qumran, rather than the mainstream traditions that coalesced after the destruction of the Second Temple.³⁰ Finally, the book was composed relatively late, placing it outside the historical window for what was considered the age of prophecy.¹³

Exclusion from Protestant and Catholic Canons:

The vast majority of Christendom does not consider 1 Enoch to be canonical.

• Protestantism: During the 16th-century Reformation, Protestant leaders such as Martin Luther emphasized a return to the Hebrew canon as the sole foundation for the Old Testament. Following the principle of Hebraica veritas (“Hebrew truth”), they accepted only those books found in the Jewish Tanakh. Since 1 Enoch was not part of that canon, it was decisively excluded along with the other books they termed the “Apocrypha”.²⁵
• Catholicism: The Catholic Church’s canon was formally defined at local councils in the late 4th century (e.g., Rome, Hippo, Carthage) and reaffirmed dogmatically at the Council of Trent in 1546 in response to the Protestant Reformation.⁴⁴ This canon, which includes the seven deuterocanonical books found in the Septuagint but not the Hebrew Bible, has never included 1 Enoch. The historical reasons for its exclusion are rooted in a lack of consistent reception throughout the universal Church and the absence of a clear line of apostolic tradition supporting its use in liturgy.⁴³ Most importantly, as theological doctrines were clarified over the centuries, the book’s teachings on the origin of sin, angelology, and the identity of the Son of Man were recognized as being in conflict with established Catholic dogma.²⁴

Inclusion in the Ethiopian and Eritrean Orthodox Canon:

The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church (and the derivative Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church) stands as the primary Christian body that accepts 1 Enoch as fully canonical and divinely inspired Scripture.² Their 81-book biblical canon reflects a unique stream of Christian tradition. This unique canonical status is largely a product of history. Ethiopia’s geographical and political isolation from the major centers of Roman and Byzantine Christianity allowed it to preserve an ancient collection of sacred texts that fell out of favor and were eventually lost elsewhere.³ The Ethiopian Church embraced Christianity during a period (c. 4th century) when

1 Enoch was still held in high regard across much of the Christian world. Having never participated in the later councils of the Western and Byzantine churches that marginalized the book, the Ethiopian tradition saw no reason to remove a text that had long been integral to its theological understanding of angelology, demonology, and eschatology.³

The divergent fates of the Book of Enoch reveal that canonicity is not the result of a single, objective evaluation of a text’s merit. Rather, it is a complex historical process of community reception, shaped by the ongoing theological needs and historical circumstances of each faith tradition. Rabbinic Judaism, consolidating its identity around the Torah and Prophets after the loss of the Temple, required a canon that supported its theological framework; Enoch did not fit. The Western defining its orthodoxy against various heresies, required a canon that was theologically consistent and grounded in clear apostolic tradition; Enoch was deemed too problematic. The Ethiopian developing in a different context, received and faithfully maintained a tradition where Enoch was an integral component. The story of Enoch’s canonization is thus a powerful case study demonstrating that a biblical canon is ultimately the collection of texts a specific faith community has received, preserved, and found to be normative for its faith and life.

Tradition	Canonical Status	Primary Reason(s) for Status
Rabbinic Judaism	Non-Canonical	Theological incompatibility (angelology, origin of evil); sectarian origins; late date of composition. 30
Roman Catholicism	Non-Canonical	Not part of the received apostolic tradition affirmed by Church Councils (e.g., Trent); contains theological errors. 44
Protestantism	Non-Canonical	Not included in the Hebrew canon (Tanakh), which is the basis for the Protestant Old Testament. 43
Ethiopian/Eritrean Orthodoxy	Canonical	Preserved from an early period when the book was held in high regard; historical isolation allowed for the retention of a broader canon. 3

VIII. The Roman Catholic Church’s Stance on the Book of Enoch

For Christian researchers, particularly those within the Catholic tradition, understanding the Church’s official position on the Book of Enoch is crucial. The stance is nuanced, distinguishing between a text’s historical value and its doctrinal authority.

The definitive position of the Roman Catholic Church is that the Book of Enoch is not canonical and not divinely inspired.³⁶ The canon of Scripture for Catholics is fixed and consists of the 73 books (46 in the Old Testament, 27 in the New Testament) that were affirmed by a series of councils from the early Church (Rome in 382, Hippo in 393, Carthage in 397) and dogmatically defined by the ecumenical Council of Trent in 1546.⁴⁴ The Book of Enoch was never a part of this received tradition. While some early Church Fathers held it in high regard, this was before the canon was formally settled, and their personal opinions do not constitute the official teaching of the Church.³⁶

But the book’s non-canonical status does not mean it is considered heretical or that its reading is forbidden. Catholics are permitted to read the Book of Enoch as a historical document.⁴⁸ It is widely recognized as a major work of ancient Jewish literature that provides valuable insight into the religious thought of the Second Temple period—the very world in which Jesus and the apostles lived.⁴⁸ The key distinction is that, because it is not Scripture, the book is not considered inerrant and may contain errors in matters of faith and morals.⁵⁰

The core reason for its definitive exclusion from the canon is its theological incompatibility with revealed truth as understood by the Church. The book contains teachings that directly contradict established Catholic doctrine. A primary example is the Enochic account of the angelic fall. 1 Enoch presents the Watchers falling after the creation of humanity, driven by their lust for human women. This conflicts with the Church’s teaching, articulated at the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), which states that the devil and other demons were created good by God but became evil by their own free and irrevocable choice before the fall of man.³⁶ Such a fundamental contradiction on the origin of evil and the nature of the angelic fall makes its inclusion in the canon impossible.

Regarding the quotation in the Epistle of Jude, the Church does not interpret this as an endorsement of the entire Book of Enoch as inspired Scripture.¹² The principle of biblical interpretation allows for an inspired author to cite a non-inspired source to affirm a particular truth contained within that source. St. Paul famously did this when he quoted pagan Greek poets to the Athenians (Acts 17:28).¹³ In the same way, Jude used a prophecy from 1 Enoch that was familiar to his audience to make a valid theological point about God’s impending judgment on the ungodly. This act validates the truth of the specific statement quoted, not the divine inspiration of the entire work from which it was drawn.³²

The Catholic position on Enoch provides a sophisticated framework for engaging with apocryphal and pseudepigraphal literature. It avoids a simplistic binary where a text is either sacred Scripture or a forbidden, heretical work. Instead, it models a way to appreciate a text like Enoch for its immense historical value and for the light it sheds on the development of religious ideas, while simultaneously maintaining the firm boundaries of the canon as the unique and inerrant rule of faith. This stance effectively separates a text’s undeniable cultural influence from its claim to divine revelation.

IX. Modern Scholarly Criticism and the Enduring Value of Enoch

While the Book of Enoch has long been excluded from the majority of biblical canons, its importance in modern academic research has only grown. Contemporary scholarship has moved beyond early debates over authenticity to explore the text’s powerful value as a window into the ancient world and its influence on subsequent religious thought.

Modern scholarly criticism is built upon several foundational conclusions regarding the text. First is the universal agreement on its pseudepigraphy; the book is a compilation attributed to, but not written by, the ancient patriarch Enoch.¹² the work contains clear

historical and scientific anachronisms. Its descriptions of the cosmos, for example, reflect the ancient worldview of a flat earth with portals for celestial bodies, which are understood as products of their time rather than as divinely revealed science.⁵¹ and most significantly for its canonical status, the book contains

theological inconsistencies when compared with the established doctrines of mainstream Judaism and Christianity, particularly concerning the origin of sin, the nature of angels, and the identity of the Son of Man.¹³

Despite these criticisms, or perhaps because of them, the Book of Enoch is now considered an indispensable primary source for understanding the religious landscape of Second Temple Judaism.¹ It reveals a world of vibrant theological diversity, intense apocalyptic expectation, and deep speculation on questions of theodicy, angelology, and eschatology. Recent academic studies have applied new analytical methods to the text, using frameworks like monster theory to interpret the Watchers 52 or conducting meticulous historical research to trace the book’s surprising availability and influence on modern figures and movements, from the poet William Blake to the early Mormon leader Joseph Smith.⁵³

The enduring value of the Book of Enoch does not lie in a claim to scriptural authority for most traditions. Instead, its significance is found in several key areas:

1. Contextualizing the New Testament: It provides an unparalleled glimpse into the conceptual world that shaped early Christianity. Familiarity with Enochic themes, symbols, and vocabulary illuminates the language and ideas of Jesus and the apostolic writers in ways that would otherwise remain obscure.¹
2. Charting Theological Development: The book serves as a crucial case study for tracing the evolution of key doctrines such as messianism, angelology, demonology, and the nature of the final judgment. Its own journey of reception and rejection provides a masterclass in the complex historical and theological processes of canon formation.³
3. A Testament to Ancient Faith: Beyond its academic utility, the Book of Enoch stands as a powerful testament to the faith of ancient Jewish communities. It captures their passionate struggle to understand the nature of a world filled with both divine goodness and powerful evil, and their unwavering hope in God’s ultimate justice and the final vindication of the righteous.

The story of this ancient text is often framed as one of a “lost” book. But the evidence suggests it was never truly lost. It was faithfully preserved in its entirety by the Ethiopian Church 3, and its core ideas persisted in the West through its deep influence on the New Testament and the early Church Fathers, even after the text itself fell into disuse. Its dramatic “rediscovery” in the 18th century ignited immediate and lasting interest, demonstrating its enduring imaginative power.⁵³ The history of the Book of Enoch is therefore not one of simple loss and recovery, but of a potent and compelling counter-narrative that has always existed, sometimes at the center and sometimes at the margins of the Judeo-Christian tradition. It addresses timeless questions about evil, justice, and the cosmos in a way that, while ultimately deemed unorthodox by the mainstream, has never ceased to challenge and fascinate the religious imagination.

Bibliography:

1. The Book of Enoch Explained – Vladimir Savchuk Ministries, accessed August 6, 2025, https://pastorvlad.org/enoch/
2. Book of Enoch | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/book-enoch
3. What Is the Book of Enoch? Why This Ancient Text Stirs So Much …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://soh.church/what-is-the-book-of-enoch/
4. The Mysterious Book of Enoch | Catholic Answers Magazine, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-mysterious-book-of-enoch
5. AllBooksOfEnoch PDF | PDF | Book Of Enoch | Religious Texts – Scribd, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/321311753/AllBooksOfEnoch-pdf
6. 2 Enoch – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_Enoch
7. Enoch’s Journey through the Heavens – 2 Enoch 1-22 – Reading Acts, accessed August 6, 2025, https://readingacts.com/2016/07/06/enochs-journey-through-the-heavens-2-enoch-1-22/
8. TITLES OF ENOCH-METATRON IN 2 ENOCH – Marquette University, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.marquette.edu/maqom/titles.html
9. Who is Metatron? The Origins of the Angel from the 3rd Book of Enoch – Sefer Hekhalot Mysticism – YouTube, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-VGkaqDxbY
10. “The Mysterious Origins of the Angel Metatron from the 3rd Book of Enoch” – Justin SLEDGE | ESOTERICA ▶️ – Portal Cioran Brasil, accessed August 6, 2025, https://portalcioranbr.wordpress.com/2022/07/08/mysterious-origins-metatron-esoterica-bloom/
11. A Layman’s Introduction to the Book of Enoch – Craig A. Smith, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.craigasmith.org/enoch/
12. What is the book of Enoch and should it be in the Bible …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/book-of-Enoch.html
13. What Is Wrong with the Book of Enoch? | Tomorrow’s World, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.tomorrowsworld.org/commentary/what-is-wrong-with-the-book-of-enoch
14. dc.etsu.edu, accessed August 6, 2025, https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2588&context=etd#:~:text=Each%20section%20of%20Enoch%20was,the%20turn%20of%20the%20era.%E2%80%9D
15. Son of Man in Enoch – Seeking the kingdom, accessed August 6, 2025, https://allenbrowne.blog/2017/07/24/son-of-man-in-enoch/
16. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch#:~:text=Ephraim%20Isaac%20suggests%20that%20the,Scrolls%20in%20the%20Qumran%20Caves.
17. Book of Enoch – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch
18. Does Jude quote Enoch? – Biblical Historical Context, accessed August 6, 2025, https://biblicalhistoricalcontext.com/biblical-inspiration/does-jude-quote-enoch/
19. The Son of Man in 1 Enoch and its implications for the Christology of the Synoptic Gospels – American Journal of Biblical Theology., accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.biblicaltheology.com/Research/QuinnKP01.pdf
20. Fallen Angels in the Book of Enoch: Who Are the Watchers …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.thecollector.com/fallen-angels-enoch/
21. The Benei Elohim, the Watchers, and the Origins of Evil – TheTorah.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.thetorah.com/article/the-benei-elohim-the-watchers-and-the-origins-of-evil
22. Angels Gone Wild: An Autobiography by Enoch (Maybe) & Friends – Ray Reynolds Rap, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.rayreynoldsrap.com/post/angels-gone-wild-an-autobiography-by-enoch-maybe-friends
23. Christian demonology – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_demonology
24. Why the Book of Enoch Is Not in the Bible: The Complete Story, accessed August 6, 2025, https://thebiblechat.com/why-the-book-of-enoch-is-not-in-the-bible/
25. Why Was the Book of Enoch Excluded from the Protestant Canon? Exploring Its History, Influence, and Controversies – Life & Hope Street Ministries, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.presentingthegospel.com/post/why-was-the-book-of-enoch-excluded-from-the-protestant-canon-exploring-its-history-influence-and
26. Who is the Son of Man in 1 Enoch 71:14? — David Wilber, accessed August 6, 2025, https://davidwilber.com/articles/who-is-the-son-of-man-in-enoch
27. 1 Enoch: the Son of Man – Livius.org, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.livius.org/sources/content/1-enoch-the-son-of-man/
28. 1 Enoch and the New Testament: Part 3, The Son of Man – Experimental Theology, accessed August 6, 2025, http://experimentaltheology.blogspot.com/2022/04/1-enoch-and-new-testament-part-3-son-of.html
29. biblical studies, theology, church history and more: The … – dianoigo, accessed August 6, 2025, https://blog.dianoigo.com/2014/09/the-son-of-man-parables-of-enoch-and.html?m=1
30. Why is the Book of Enoch not a canon book of the Bible? : r/religion – Reddit, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/religion/comments/vbihng/why_is_the_book_of_enoch_not_a_canon_book_of_the/
31. 2 Peter & Jude – Day 27 – Journey Through Series, accessed August 6, 2025, https://journeythrough.org/courses/2-peter-jude/lessons/day-27-21/
32. Why Did Jude Quote From the Book of 1 Enoch? – Cyber Penance – WordPress.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://cyberpenance.wordpress.com/2018/08/27/why-did-jude-quote-from-the-book-of-1-enoch/
33. The Relationship Between Jude and 2 Peter – Olive Tree Blog, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.olivetree.com/blog/jude-and-2-peter/
34. The Book of Enoch and Its Importance to Anyone Interested in …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://blog.nes.edu/the_book_of_enoch_and_its_importance_to_anyone_interested_in_biblical_history
35. CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: The Book of Enoch – New Advent, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01602a.htm
36. Is the Church Hiding the Book of Enoch? | Catholic Answers Podcasts, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.catholic.com/audio/caf/is-the-church-hiding-the-book-of-enoch
37. 1 Enoch: Inspired Revelation or Apocryphon? – Ad Fontes Journal, accessed August 6, 2025, https://adfontesjournal.com/andrew-koperski/1-enoch-inspired-revelation-or-apocryphon/
38. Tertullian on Enoch | – WordPress.com, accessed August 6, 2025, https://stefangillies.wordpress.com/tertullian-on-enoch/
39. Tertullian (c. 200 AD) wrote that the book of Enoch was rejected by Jews because it “prophesied of Christ.” Is this claim corroborated by other sources? – Reddit, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/1fww4zi/tertullian_c_200_ad_wrote_that_the_book_of_enoch/
40. The Book of Enoch in Reference to the New Testament and Early Christian Antiquity, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/472294
41. CHURCH FATHERS: Commentary on John, Book VI (Origen), accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/101506.htm
42. City of God, XVIII, 38 – Logos Virtual Library: Saint Augustine, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.logoslibrary.org/augustine/city/1838.html
43. Why 1 Enoch Is Not in the Canon of Scripture, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.genesismarksthespot.com/blog/why-1-enoch-is-not-in-the-canon-of-scripture/
44. Why did the Council of Trent accept some apocryphal books of the Bible but not others?, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.catholic.com/qa/why-did-the-council-of-trent-accept-some-apocryphal-books-of-the-bible-but-not-others
45. Why is the Book of Enoch not considered to be canonical in Catholic teachings? – Reddit, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/comments/qstcp8/why_is_the_book_of_enoch_not_considered_to_be/
46. The Book of Enoch – Tasbeha.org Community, accessed August 6, 2025, https://tasbeha.org/community/discussion/9472/the-book-of-enoch
47. How do we, as Catholics, view the Book of Enoch? : r/Catholicism – Reddit, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/comments/1bjcz3m/how_do_we_as_catholics_view_the_book_of_enoch/
48. Are Catholics allowed to read the Book of Enoch? – Quora, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.quora.com/Are-Catholics-allowed-to-read-the-Book-of-Enoch
49. What does the Church teach about the Book of Enoch? – Our Sunday Visitor, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.oursundayvisitor.com/what-does-the-church-teach-about-the-book-of-enoch/
50. What is the Catholic view of the Book of Enoch? – Christianity Stack Exchange, accessed August 6, 2025, https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/84245/what-is-the-catholic-view-of-the-book-of-enoch
51. Why is the Book of Enoch not regarded as canonical? – Christianity Stack Exchange, accessed August 6, 2025, https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/8576/why-is-the-book-of-enoch-not-regarded-as-canonical
52. Monster Theory and the Book of Enoch: Angels and Giants as Chaos and Identity – The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College, accessed August 6, 2025, https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2125&context=student_scholarship
53. Revisiting Joseph Smith and the Availability of the Book of Enoch …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.dialoguejournal.com/articles/revisiting-joseph-smith-and-the-availability-of-the-book-of-enoch/