A Pastoral and Scholarly Inquiry into Mormonism and Nicene Christianity

What is the Bedrock of Historic Christian Faith? Understanding the Nicene Creed

To begin a heartfelt and serious inquiry into the relationship between Mormonism and the historic Christian faith, one must first lay a firm foundation. That foundation, for nearly seventeen centuries, has been the Nicene Creed. This is not a dry, academic document forged in intellectual leisure, but a passionate and vital confession of faith, born from a period of powerful spiritual crisis, that has defined the very boundaries of Christian orthodoxy. It stands as a testament to the core truths for which the early Church was willing to contend, believing the salvation of souls was at stake.

The Creed was not written in a vacuum. Its formulation was an urgent necessity, prompted by the teachings of a fourth-century church leader named Arius. Arius argued that Jesus Christ, the Son, was not co-eternal with God the Father but was, in fact, God’s first and greatest creation.¹ This was no small theological disagreement; it struck at the very heart of the Gospel. If Jesus is a created being, however exalted, then He is not fully God. If He is not fully God, then His sacrifice on the cross is not the saving work of God Himself, and the redemption of humanity hangs in the balance.¹ The widespread adoption of these teachings threatened to destabilize not only the Church but the entire Roman Empire, compelling Emperor Constantine to convene the First Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. To resolve the dispute.⁴

The council’s response, refined at the First Council of Constantinople in 381 A.D., is, above all, a Trinitarian statement of faith.¹ It is structured in three parts, confessing one God who exists eternally as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.¹ It insists that Jesus is the “eternal Son of God, always has been and always will be fully equal with the Father and the Spirit”.¹ To defend this truth, the bishops at the council crafted language with surgical precision. The phrases “begotten, not made” and “of one being with the Father” became the bulwark of orthodoxy. To be “made” is to be a creature, which is what Arius claimed of the Son. To be “begotten,” But speaks to the unique, eternal, and divine relationship of the Son to the Father within the Godhead.³ The Greek term homoousios, translated as “of one being” or “consubstantial,” became the theological heart of the Creed. It declares that the Son is not merely like the Father in purpose or will, but shares the very same divine substance, or essence, as the Father.⁴

Thus, the Nicene Creed became the “only authoritative ecumenical statement of the Christian faith” accepted by the overwhelming majority of Christendom, including the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Anglican, and most Protestant churches.⁴ For centuries, it has been recited in worship services across the globe, serving as a unifying declaration of the faith once for all delivered to the saints.²

It is therefore most helpful to understand the Creed not as a set of restrictive human rules or an imposition of “Greek philosophy,” as some critics have alleged 7, but as the early Church’s Spirit-guided immune response to a theological virus that threatened the life of the faith. A healthy body identifies and neutralizes threats. The body of Christ, the faced a mortal threat in Arianism, which questioned the divine identity of its Head, Jesus Christ.¹ By demoting Jesus to a creature, Arianism rendered the worship of Jesus a form of idolatry and made our salvation profoundly uncertain. The councils of Nicaea and Constantinople, acting as the Church’s immune system, identified this foreign teaching and produced the theological “antibodies”—the precise language of “begotten, not made” and “consubstantial”—to neutralize the threat and preserve the spiritual health of the faithful.² Viewing the Creed as a life-preserving confession, born of pastoral necessity, provides the proper framework for understanding its powerful conflict with the teachings of Mormonism, which views the Creed itself not as the cure, but as the disease.⁹

Who is God? A Tale of Two Theologies

The most fundamental point of divergence between Nicene Christianity and Mormonism is the doctrine of God. The two traditions do not simply have a minor disagreement on the details of the Godhead; they present two mutually exclusive and irreconcilable conceptions of who God is.

The Nicene faith, as confessed for centuries, is uncompromisingly monotheistic. It professes one eternal, uncreated God who exists as three co-equal and co-eternal persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These three persons are not separate gods, nor are they mere modes or manifestations of God; they share one divine substance (ousia).¹ This God is spirit, immaterial, and the sovereign Creator who brought all things into being out of nothing (

ex nihilo).¹⁰

In stark contrast, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) teaches that the Godhead is a council of three separate and distinct divine beings: God the Father (whom they call Elohim), His Son Jesus Christ (whom they identify as the Old Testament Jehovah), and the Holy Ghost.⁷ A central and defining feature of this doctrine is the belief that God the Father and Jesus Christ possess perfected, glorified, tangible bodies of “flesh and bones as tangible as man’s”.⁷ The Holy Ghost alone is a “personage of Spirit”.¹² The “oneness” of this Godhead is not a unity of essence or being, but a perfect unity of purpose, will, and mind.¹¹ While the LDS Church sometimes describes this as “social trinitarianism,” critics have consistently identified it as a form of tritheism (belief in three gods) or polytheism.⁷

LDS theology introduces doctrines entirely unknown to Nicene Christianity. The famous couplet from early LDS leader Lorenzo Snow summarizes a core belief: “As man now is, God once was: / As God now is, man may be”.⁷ This is the doctrine of eternal progression, which holds that God the Father was once a mortal man on another planet who lived a righteous life and progressed to a state of godhood.⁷ Integral to this belief is the existence of a Heavenly Mother, the wife of God the Father.⁷ Together, these heavenly parents are believed to be the literal, procreating spirit-parents of all humanity.⁷ This theology also rejects the doctrine of creation ex nihilo, teaching instead that God did not create the universe from nothing, but rather organized it from pre-existing, eternal matter and intelligence.⁷

The most powerful and far-reaching consequence of this theology is the complete collapse of the biblical distinction between the Creator and the creature. This is not merely a different view of God’s attributes; it is a redefinition of reality itself. Historic Christianity is built upon the absolute, infinite gap between God, the uncreated and self-existent Creator, and everything else, which is His creation.¹ In LDS theology, this gap is erased. By teaching that God the Father is an exalted man and that humans are his literal offspring who share his divine “species,” the relationship is reframed from one of Creator-to-creature to one of Parent-to-child.⁷ The difference between God and man becomes one of degree of development, not of kind of being. Consequently, the very purpose of salvation is transformed. In Nicene Christianity, the goal is eternal life in loving communion with God. In Mormonism, the ultimate goal is “exaltation”—progressing to become a god like God the Father, with the power to create and rule over one’s own worlds.¹⁴ This reveals that the disagreement is not simply about the number of persons in the Godhead, but about the fundamental nature of God, man, and the purpose of existence. It is the single most major and irreconcilable difference, from which all other doctrinal divergences flow.

Who is Jesus Christ? The One and Only Son vs. The Firstborn Spirit Brother

Flowing directly from these two different conceptions of God are two fundamentally different conceptions of Jesus Christ. While both traditions call him the “Son of God” and “Savior,” the meaning behind these titles is so radically different that they are, in truth, speaking of two different beings.

The Christ of the Nicene Creed is the “only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, true God from true God, begotten, not made, of one being with the Father”.¹ His Sonship is an eternal, uncreated reality within the Triune Godhead. He is utterly unique, the second person of the Trinity, who took on human flesh for our salvation. He is not a son in the way humans are sons; His is a unique and eternal divine relationship.

The Christ of Mormon theology is understood very differently. He is the firstborn spirit child of God the Father and a Heavenly Mother, conceived in a pre-mortal existence before this world was organized.⁷ Because all human beings are also believed to be spirit children of these same heavenly parents, Jesus is quite literally our elder brother.¹⁸ This doctrine also implies that Lucifer, or Satan, is a spirit brother of both Jesus and humanity, who rebelled against the Father’s plan in the pre-mortal life.¹⁵ In this framework, Jesus is a god, but a separate being from the Father and is generally seen as subordinate to Him.⁷ His divinity is not inherent in the same way as the Father’s, but is an inherited attribute. As one LDS source describes it, he is “God the Second,” possessing a “derivative divinity”.¹⁷ This understanding fundamentally denies that Jesus shares the same eternal nature and substance as God the Father.¹⁷

This brings into focus a powerful historical irony. The LDS doctrine of Christ—which posits Him as the first and greatest of all spirit children and a being subordinate to the Father—is a functional and theological echo of the very Arian view that the Nicene Creed was formulated to condemn. Arius taught that the Son was not co-eternal with the Father but was the first and highest of God’s creations.¹ LDS doctrine teaches that Jesus is the “Firstborn of the Father in the spirit” 15, created before all others. Both views place Christ in the category of a created being rather than the uncreated Creator. Both deny the Son’s co-eternality and consubstantiality with the Father. The irony is that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints identifies the Nicene Creed—the definitive anti-Arian statement—as a product of apostasy, while simultaneously embracing a Christology that mirrors the core tenets of the very teaching the Creed was written to correct.⁹ This reveals that the conflict is not over a new, modern idea, but over a very old one that the historic Church prayerfully considered and, guided by the Holy Spirit, definitively rejected.

Core Doctrinal Comparisons: Nicene Christianity vs. Latter-day Saint Theology

Doctrinal Point	Nicene Christianity	The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Nature of God	One God in three co-equal, co-eternal persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) of one substance (homoousios). God is an uncreated, immaterial Spirit.	A Godhead of three separate, distinct gods (Father, Son, Holy Ghost) who are one in purpose. God the Father is an exalted man with a physical body.
Origin of God	God is the eternal, uncreated, self-existent “I AM,” existing outside of time and space.	God the Father was once a mortal man who progressed to godhood (“eternal progression”). He has a divine wife, the Heavenly Mother.
Creation	God created the universe ex nihilo (out of nothing).	God organized the universe out of pre-existing, eternal matter and intelligence.
Nature of Christ	The eternally begotten Son of God, uncreated, fully God and fully man, consubstantial (of one being) with the Father.	The firstborn spirit child of the Father and Heavenly Mother; a separate and subordinate god to the Father. Our elder brother.
Humanity’s Nature	Created in the image of God, but distinct from God in being (Creator vs. creature).	Literal spirit children of God, of the same “species” as God, with the potential to progress to godhood (exaltation).
The Fall	A tragic rebellion that introduced sin and death, separating humanity from God.	A necessary and planned step in the “Plan of Salvation,” enabling humanity to gain bodies and experience good and evil.
Goal of Salvation	Eternal life in loving communion with God.	Exaltation to godhood, to become like God, creating and ruling over worlds.

How Was Truth Lost? The Mormon Doctrine of the Great Apostasy

The theological justification for the existence of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day and the reason for its radical departure from historic Christianity, is its foundational narrative of the Great Apostasy. This doctrine posits that the original Church established by Jesus Christ did not survive, but fell away completely, necessitating a complete restoration in modern times.

According to LDS teaching, this universal apostasy began soon after the death of Christ’s original Apostles.²⁰ The narrative asserts a catastrophic loss on two fronts. First was the loss of priesthood authority. The special authority to act in God’s name, and particularly the “keys” held by the Apostles to receive revelation and lead the entire was taken from the earth with their martyrdom.²³ Second was the corruption of doctrine. Pure Christian teachings were allegedly polluted by the infusion of Greek philosophical concepts, leading the Church astray.⁷ From the LDS perspective, the development of creedal Christianity, with the Nicene Creed as its prime exhibit, is not a defense of the truth but a primary symptom and result of this very apostasy.⁸

This period is described as a spiritual “famine… Of hearing the words of the Lord,” referencing the prophet Amos.²⁴ It is taught that for centuries, good and sincere people sought the truth but could not find it in its fulness because the true Church and its divine authority were no longer on the earth.²⁴ While the Protestant Reformation is acknowledged as a positive step led by inspired men like Martin Luther and John Calvin who recognized problems within the existing it is deemed insufficient. Without the restoration of divine priesthood authority, they could only reform a fallen church; they could not restore Christ’s true and living Church.²⁴

This doctrine of the Great Apostasy functions as a “cosmic reset button” within the Mormon historical narrative. It is more than just a claim about historical events; it is a theological device that serves to invalidate nearly two millennia of Christian history, theology, and authority. Where the Protestant Reformation saw a church that was corrupt and in need of reformation, the LDS narrative posits a church that was dead and in need of resurrection.¹⁷ By claiming that the Church Christ founded completely died out, this doctrine effectively erases the legitimacy of the Catholic line of succession, the faith of the Orthodox churches, and the gains of the Protestant reformers, rendering them all, in the LDS view, man-made organizations lacking divine authority.¹⁷ This narrative of a complete break creates a theological vacuum. If the true Church was gone from the earth, it could not be reformed; it had to be restored from the heavens. This makes the “Restoration” through Joseph Smith not just one option among many Christian movements, but the only possible divine solution to the problem that the Apostasy narrative itself creates. Understanding this is essential, for the Great Apostasy is the foundational premise upon which the entire structure of LDS theology and its exclusive claims to authority rests.²⁵

How is Truth Restored? Joseph Smith’s First Vision and the Rejection of the Creeds

If the Great Apostasy is the narrative of how truth was lost, the foundational event of its restoration is Joseph Smith’s First Vision. This singular experience serves as the divine charter for Mormonism and its rejection of all of Nicene Christianity.

According to the official account, when Joseph Smith was about 14 years old (circa 1820), he was troubled by the competing claims of the various Christian denominations in his area. Seeking wisdom, he went to a grove of trees to pray and ask God which church he should join. In response, he recorded that he received a heavenly manifestation in which two divine personages, whom he identified as God the Father and Jesus Christ, appeared to him.²⁷ The central message of this vision, and its most consequential element, was the instruction he reported receiving from Jesus Christ to “join none of them, for they were all wrong.” The account continues that the Lord said of the existing churches that “all their creeds were an abomination in his sight; that those professors were all corrupt”.⁹ This divine condemnation of all existing Christian creeds is the theological ground zero for the LDS departure from the historic faith.

It is pastorally and scholarly important to note that there are multiple accounts of this vision, which differ in their details and emphasis.²⁷ The earliest known account, written by Joseph Smith himself in 1832, focuses on his personal anxiety over his sins and his desire for forgiveness, and it mentions seeing “the Lord” who forgave him.²⁷ Later accounts, dictated in 1835 and 1838, shift the emphasis to the question of “which church is right” and more explicitly describe the appearance of two distinct personages.²⁷ Critics of the LDS Church point to these variations as evidence that the story evolved over time, perhaps being embellished to support developing theological claims.²⁸ The Church itself explains these differences as natural variations in retelling an experience for different audiences and purposes over many years, similar to how the Apostle Paul recounted his conversion experience differently in the book of Acts.²⁷

Regardless of the variations, the official 1838 account and its message form the bedrock of the Restoration. This event functions as a theological and historical inversion of the Council of Nicaea. Where Nicaea represented a public, conciliar event where hundreds of bishops from across the Christian world gathered to prayerfully discern the truth about Christ’s nature, resulting in the Creed 2, the First Vision was a private, individual experience wherein one young man reported receiving a revelation that dismissed the entire collective and historical witness of the Church.⁹ The conclusion of Nicaea was that belief in the consubstantial, Triune God is essential to true Christian faith. The reported conclusion of the First Vision was that the very creeds defining this belief were an “abomination” in God’s sight.⁸ This places the two events in direct and irreconcilable opposition. One cannot logically accept the divine authority of both. To embrace the First Vision as a true revelation from God inherently requires one to reject the authority, the process, and the conclusions of Nicaea and the seventeen centuries of creedal Christianity that followed. This reveals the stark, binary choice presented by the two traditions—a choice between two mutually exclusive foundational events and their competing claims to divine authority.

How is Authority Transmitted? Apostolic Succession vs. Priesthood Restoration

The powerful theological differences between Nicene Christianity and Mormonism are given institutional form in their competing claims to legitimate spiritual authority. These are not merely administrative disagreements but are the direct consequence of their foundational narratives.

The majority of Nicene Christianity—including the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Anglican, and some Lutheran traditions—believes in apostolic succession. This is the doctrine that spiritual authority, bestowed by Christ upon His Apostles, has been passed down through an unbroken line of bishops via the rite of ordination, often called the “laying on of hands”.³¹ This succession is understood not just as a transfer of an office, but as a tangible link to the Apostles that guarantees doctrinal continuity and the valid administration of the sacraments, which are the means of grace.³² It is a doctrine of continuity, asserting that Christ’s with its authority structure, has persevered through history as He promised.

Mormonism, by contrast, teaches a doctrine of restoration. As a direct consequence of the Great Apostasy, it is believed that the chain of apostolic succession was broken and that true priesthood authority was lost from the earth.²³ Therefore, this authority could not be passed on by men but had to be restored directly from heaven. LDS doctrine teaches that this occurred through a series of angelic visitations to Joseph Smith and his associate, Oliver Cowdery. They testify that John the Baptist appeared and conferred upon them the Aaronic Priesthood, which holds authority for ordinances like baptism. Subsequently, they teach that the ancient Apostles Peter, James, and John appeared and restored the higher Melchizedek Priesthood, which holds the “keys of the kingdom” and the authority to lead the Church and confer the gift of the Holy Ghost.²⁰

A key element of the LDS argument against Nicene succession is the distinction between the offices of Apostle and bishop. They argue that in the early the twelve Apostles held a universal authority, or “keys,” to preside over the entire whereas bishops held only local authority over specific congregations. When the Apostles were martyred, their universal keys were lost from the earth, and the remaining bishops, lacking apostolic authority, could not validly pass it on.³⁸ This restored priesthood is therefore believed to be the only valid divine authority on earth today, which undergirds the claim of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to be “the only true and living church upon the face of the whole earth”.¹⁴

These competing models of authority are the necessary conclusions of their respective historical narratives. Each model of authority exists to validate its own foundational story. If one believes, as Nicene Christianity does, that the Church Christ founded has been preserved throughout history, then a mechanism like apostolic succession is needed to explain that tangible preservation.³² The authority model of succession serves to prove the narrative of continuity. Conversely, if one believes, as Mormonism does, that the Church Christ founded died out and was lost, then a mechanism like priesthood restoration is needed to explain its miraculous reappearance.²³ The authority model of restoration serves to prove the narrative of apostasy. Therefore, the debate over authority is secondary to the primary conflict between the two stories of God’s work in the world. The claim to authority is the conclusion, not the premise, of a much deeper disagreement about history itself.

What is the Word of God? The Closed Canon of the Bible vs. Continuing Revelation

Directly tied to the question of authority is the question of scripture. The two traditions hold fundamentally different views on the nature and extent of God’s written word, a difference that enables and sustains the theological divide.

Historic Christianity, in both its Catholic and Protestant expressions, affirms that the canon of Scripture is closed. This means that the books of the Old and New Testaments constitute the complete and final written revelation from God necessary for faith and salvation.⁴¹ Although Interpretations of the Bible’s inerrancy and inspiration may vary between denominations, there is a shared conviction that God’s public, saving revelation in written form concluded with the apostolic era.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day But teaches the doctrine of an open canon and continuing revelation. While they profess belief in the Bible “as far as it is translated correctly,” they do not believe it is either inerrant or complete.¹⁰ A central tenet of the faith is that many “plain and precious” truths were lost or deliberately removed from the biblical text over the centuries.¹⁰ Consequently, the LDS scriptural canon is “open” and includes three additional books which are held to be holy scripture on par with the Bible:

The Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price.¹⁰

Even more crucial to this doctrine is the belief in living prophets and apostles. The President of the LDS Church is regarded as a “prophet, seer, and revelator” who receives ongoing revelation from God for the guidance of the entire Church.¹⁴ His authoritative pronouncements, and those of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, can be accepted by the church as modern-day scripture.¹⁷ This system allows for new doctrines to be introduced and for official teachings to be altered over time, as seen in historical changes regarding practices like polygamy or policies regarding priesthood eligibility.²²

The doctrine of an open canon is not merely an interesting addendum to LDS belief; it is the essential theological engine that permits and legitimizes the faith’s radical departures from Nicene orthodoxy. The core doctrines of Mormonism—such as an embodied, progressing God, a premortal existence as spirit children, and the ultimate goal of exaltation to godhood—are not found in the Bible. If the Bible were the sole and final authority as defined by a closed canon, these new doctrines would be indefensible. But the introduction of new scriptural texts and the conferral of scriptural authority upon the words of living prophets create the necessary divine warrant for these innovations.¹⁷ The open canon thus serves a critical function: it breaks the authoritative monopoly of the Bible and establishes a system where the “Restoration” can introduce entirely new theological concepts under the mantle of continuing divine revelation. The debate over the canon is therefore a debate over the very source and boundaries of truth itself.

What is the Official Stance of the Catholic Church on Mormon Baptism?

For Christian researchers seeking a definitive statement from a major branch of Nicene Christianity, the position of the Roman Catholic Church on Mormon baptism is both clear and theologically instructive. The question of its validity is not left to speculation but has been answered with formal, binding authority.

In June 2001, the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), at that time presided over by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (who would later become Pope Benedict XVI), issued a formal response to a dubium (a formal question requiring a “yes” or “no” answer) concerning the validity of baptism conferred in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The one-word response was, “Negative”.⁴⁴ This ruling is decisive: the Catholic Church does not consider Mormon baptism to be a valid Christian baptism. Consequently, a person who was baptized in the LDS Church and later wishes to convert to Catholicism must be baptized, as they are considered unbaptized from the perspective of the Catholic Church.¹⁹

The CDF provided a detailed theological explanation for this decision, which goes to the heart of the doctrinal differences. The core reasoning is that the disparity between Mormonism and Christianity is so powerful that they cannot be considered variations of the same faith. The official commentary states that the differences are “so great that one cannot even consider that this doctrine is a heresy which emerged out of a false understanding of the Christian doctrine. The teaching of the Mormons has a completely different matrix”.⁴⁸ It is not a branch of Christianity that has gone astray, but a different tree altogether.

This leads to two critical points that render the baptism invalid. First is the difference in the object of faith. Although the Mormon baptismal rite uses the Trinitarian formula—”In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit”—the words do not mean the same thing. The formula does not invoke the Triune God of Nicene faith but rather three separate gods who form a “divinity”.⁴⁴ Because the God being invoked is fundamentally different, the baptism itself is different. Second is the lack of proper intention. For any baptism to be valid, the minister must have the general intention “to do what the Church does”.⁵¹ The CDF argues that a Mormon minister, who believes in a different God, a different Christ, and a different origin for the rite of baptism itself (believing it was instituted by God with Adam, not by Christ), cannot possibly have the same intention as the Christian Church when conferring the sacrament.⁴⁹

This ruling has direct pastoral implications, clarifying that converts from Mormonism are to be treated as unbaptized individuals.⁵⁴ It also affects how the Church handles marriages between Catholics and Mormons. Such unions are now treated as “disparity of cult” marriages—a marriage between a baptized Catholic and a non-baptized person—which requires a specific dispensation from the bishop and is not considered a sacramental marriage.⁴⁷

The semi-official LDS response to this Vatican declaration is equally revealing. A church spokesman was quoted as saying, “We don’t have an issue with the fact that the Catholic Church doesn’t recognize our baptisms, because we don’t recognize theirs”.¹⁹ This is not a casual dismissal but the perfectly logical and consistent expression of Mormonism’s own foundational doctrines. From the LDS perspective, which is built on the narrative of a Great Apostasy, all of Nicene Christianity, including Catholicism, lost its priesthood authority nearly two thousand years ago.²³ Therefore, in their view, Catholic baptism has long been invalid, and they require all converts, including former Catholics, to be baptized into the LDS Church.⁴⁷ This creates a perfect, if unbridgeable, symmetry of mutual non-recognition. Both traditions, for their own internally consistent theological reasons, must regard the other’s core ordinances as invalid, highlighting the irreconcilable nature of their exclusive claims to be the one true Church of Jesus Christ.

Are Latter-day Saints Christians? A Difficult but Necessary Theological Question

Perhaps the most frequently asked question, and the most sensitive, is whether Latter-day Saints are Christians. The answer is not simple, as it depends entirely on the definition of “Christian” one chooses to use. Different groups employ different criteria, leading to different conclusions.¹⁰

From a sociological perspective, or one based on self-identification, the answer would be yes. Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints sincerely consider themselves to be Christians. They worship Jesus Christ as their Savior and Redeemer, and the official name of their church explicitly centers on Him.¹⁰ They see themselves not as leaving Christianity, but as practicing its purest, restored form.²⁰ In the broad landscape of world religions, Mormonism is almost always categorized as a movement that originated from Christianity. Public opinion on the matter remains divided.¹⁰

But from the perspective of historic, theological, and creedal Christianity, the answer is no. This conclusion is not based on a judgment of the sincerity or moral character of Latter-day but on foundational matters of doctrine. As has been demonstrated, Mormonism uses a shared Christian vocabulary—words like “God,” “Jesus,” “gospel,” and “salvation”—but redefines these terms in ways that are fundamentally incompatible with their historic, biblical, and creedal meanings.¹⁷ The most critical point of departure is the explicit rejection of the doctrine of the Trinity, which is the central, non-negotiable definition of the God of Christian faith as confessed by the ecumenical creeds for seventeen centuries.¹⁰ For this reason, many scholars of religion, including those who are otherwise sympathetic to the faith, categorize Mormonism not as a denomination within Christianity, but as a new religious tradition that emerged from Christianity, in much the same way that Christianity itself emerged from Second Temple Judaism.¹⁰

A more pastorally fruitful and theologically precise approach is to move beyond the ambiguous “yes or no” label and reframe the central question. Instead of asking, “Are Mormons Christians?” we should ask, “Do Mormons and Nicene Christians worship the same Christ?” Based on the doctrinal evidence, the answer to that question is clearly no. The label “Christian” can be a source of contention and misunderstanding. The identity of the person at the center of the faith, But is paramount. The Christ of the Nicene faith is the uncreated, eternally begotten, consubstantial Son of God, one in being with the Father. The Christ of LDS faith is a created spirit, the firstborn of heavenly parents, a separate and subordinate being to the Father, and the elder brother of humanity. These are not merely two different interpretations of the same person; they describe two fundamentally different beings. By shifting the focus of discussion from the label (“Are you a Christian?”) to the object of worship (“Tell me about the Jesus you follow”), one can foster a more meaningful dialogue. This approach affirms the sincerity of the other person while gently but clearly highlighting the powerful and substantive difference that lies at the very heart of the two faiths. It is an approach that is at once more charitable and more theologically precise.

How Then Shall We Live? A Call for Gracious Engagement and Faithful Witness

The deep and irreconcilable theological chasm between Mormonism and Nicene Christianity does not absolve Christians of the command to love their neighbors. The question then becomes how to engage with members of the LDS faith in a manner that is both gracious and uncompromisingly faithful to the Gospel.

We must acknowledge areas of common ground and shared moral values. The LDS Church itself actively promotes and participates in interfaith dialogue and humanitarian partnerships, often working alongside Catholic and Protestant organizations to serve the poor and needy.⁵⁶ These efforts are based on universal values and the shared mandate to “love thy neighbor as thyself”.⁵⁷ Christians can and should find opportunities to work shoulder to shoulder with their LDS neighbors to build stronger communities and care for the vulnerable.

In this engagement, we would do well to adopt the principles for religious understanding articulated by the late Lutheran Bishop Krister Stendahl, which are often promoted by the LDS Church itself: (1) when trying to understand another religion, ask its adherents, not its enemies; (2) do not compare your best to their worst; and (3) leave room for “holy envy” by finding elements to genuinely admire in the other’s faith and practice, such as their strong family orientation or commitment to service.⁵⁶

At the same time, we must heed the LDS Church’s own wise counsel that “interfaith cooperation does not require doctrinal compromise”.⁵⁷ Our kindness must never be mistaken for doctrinal indifference. Our ultimate calling as Christians is to bear witness to the one true God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—and to the one Lord Jesus Christ as He is revealed in the Holy Scriptures and confessed in the Creeds. Fulfilling this call requires deep listening to genuinely understand what our LDS neighbors believe in their own words; deep knowledge of our own historic faith so that we can articulate its beauty and coherence with gentle confidence; and deep love that engages not as a debater seeking victory, but as an ambassador for Christ, motivated by a sincere desire for all people to know the Triune God who has revealed Himself fully and finally in the person of Jesus.

The goal of this engagement is not to win a theological argument but to introduce people to a person. The conflict between Mormonism and Nicene Christianity is a conflict between two revelations, two Gods, and two Christs. Logic and history can expose inconsistencies, but they rarely convert the human heart. The power of the Gospel lies not in its logical perfection alone, but in the compelling love and beauty of the Triune God revealed in the face of the crucified and risen Christ. The most powerful form of witness is a life so transformed by the grace of the Nicene Christ that it becomes an irresistible testimony to His truth, power, and love. The bridge we are called to build is not made of better propositions, but is an introduction to a better, truer, and more beautiful Savior.

Bibliography:

1. The Nicene Creed: a summary of Christian belief | Nelson Anglicans …, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.nelsonanglican.nz/korero/nicene-creed
2. Nicene Creed | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/nicene-creed
3. The Nicene Creed | Reformed Church in America, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.rca.org/about/theology/creeds-and-confessions/the-nicene-creed/
4. Nicene Creed – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed
5. The Nicene Creed | The Church of England, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofengland.org/faith-life/what-we-believe/nicene-creed
6. What is the Nicene Creed and What Does it mean for Catholics? – Catholic World Mission, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.catholicworldmission.org/post/what-is-the-nicene-creed-and-what-does-it-mean-for-catholics
7. God in Mormonism – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_in_Mormonism
8. Apostasy and Restoration – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/1995/04/apostasy-and-restoration?lang=eng
9. “All Their Creeds Were an Abomination” | Religious Studies Center – BYU, accessed August 5, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/prelude-restoration/all-their-creeds-were-abomination
10. Mormonism and Nicene Christianity – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormonism_and_Nicene_Christianity
11. How does the LDS Church reconcile their understanding of the “Godhead” which is three beings/three gods with the Bible stating there is only one God?, accessed August 5, 2025, https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/84070/how-does-the-lds-church-reconcile-their-understanding-of-the-godhead-which-is
12. Godhead – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/godhead?lang=eng
13. www.churchofjesuschrist.org, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/god-the-father?lang=eng#:~:text=God%20the%20Father%20is%20the,bones%20as%20tangible%20as%20man’s.%E2%80%9D
14. Comparison Chart – Mormonism and Christianity – Apologetics, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.namb.net/apologetics/resource/comparison-chart-mormonism-and-christianity/
15. Basic Doctrines – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/new-testament-seminary-teacher-manual/appendix/basic-doctrines?lang=eng
16. What do Mormons believe about the Godhead?, accessed August 5, 2025, https://mormonchurch.com/1699/what-do-mormons-believe-holy-trinity
17. 7 Reasons Why Mormonism and Christianity Are Not the Same | Clearly Reformed, accessed August 5, 2025, https://clearlyreformed.org/7-reasons-why-mormonism-and-christianity-are-not-the-same/
18. What Do Mormons Really Believe? – Phoenix Seminary, accessed August 5, 2025, https://ps.edu/what-do-mormons-really-believe/
19. Vatican Warns of Mormon ‘Baptism of the Dead’ – U.S. News – News …, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.catholic.org/news/national/story.php?id=27825
20. Mormonism – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormonism
21. Is Mormonism Christian? An Investigation of De nitions, part 3 – BYU …, accessed August 5, 2025, https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=3&article=1056&context=mi&type=additional
22. Nicene Creed and Mormons : r/exmormon – Reddit, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/42o21p/nicene_creed_and_mormons/
23. Restoration (Mormonism) – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restoration_(Mormonism)
24. The Great Apostasy – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/the-restoration/the-great-apostasy?lang=eng
25. Are Mormons (And Protestants) Right about the “Great Apostasy”? – Catholic Answers, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.catholic.com/audio/sp/are-mormons-and-protestants-right-about-the-great-apostasy
26. Introduction-Introducing Christianity to Mormons, accessed August 5, 2025, https://mrm.org/introducing-introduction
27. First Vision Accounts – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics-essays/first-vision-accounts?lang=eng
28. First Vision Accounts – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/first-vision-accounts?lang=eng
29. “A World in Darkness”: Early Latter-day Saint Understanding of the Apostasy, 1830–34, accessed August 5, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/window-faith/world-darkness-early-latter-day-saint-understanding-apostasy-1830-34
30. Overview of First Vision Accounts – LDS Discussions, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.ldsdiscussions.com/firstvision-overview
31. If the Apostolic Succession is true, why don’t bishops have healing powers? – Reddit, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateReligion/comments/95bpp0/if_the_apostolic_succession_is_true_why_dont/
32. Apostolic succession – Wikipedia, accessed August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_succession
33. Old and New Testament Connections to the Priesthood – CATECHIST Magazine, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.catechist.com/old-new-testament-connections-priesthood/
34. (PDF) SURVEY OF APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION: ITS HISTORY AND IMPACT ON RELATED DOCTRINES – ResearchGate, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371985486_SURVEY_OF_APOSTOLIC_SUCCESSION_ITS_HISTORY_AND_IMPACT_ON_RELATED_DOCTRINES
35. Mormon Priesthood – A History, accessed August 5, 2025, https://mormonbeliefs.org/mormon_beliefs/mormon-beliefs-the-great-apostasy-and-the-restoration/what-is-mormon-priesthood/mormon-priesthood-a-history/
36. “The Circumference of the Apostleship” | Religious Studies Center, accessed August 5, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/firm-foundation/circumference-apostleship
37. Priesthood Restoration Documents – BYU Studies, accessed August 5, 2025, https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/priesthood-restoration-documents
38. Priesthood – Lost & Found: Evidences – Latter-day Saints Q & A, accessed August 5, 2025, https://latterdaysaintsqa.com/priesthood-lost-found-evidences/
39. Mormonism and priesthood/Evidence for Possession of Priesthood Authority – FAIR Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/Mormonism_and_priesthood/Evidence_for_Possession_of_Priesthood_Authority
40. Apostolic Succession and Historical Inquiry: Some Preliminary Remarks, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.calledtocommunion.com/2013/05/apostolic-succession-and-historical-inquiry-some-preliminary-remarks/
41. Catholicism and Mormonism | Religious Studies Center – BYU, accessed August 5, 2025, https://rsc.byu.edu/latter-day-saint-essentials/catholicism-mormonism
42. Book of Mormon – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/bofm?lang=eng
43. LDS Church Baptism Policy Reversal: The Original 2015 Reactions – Design Mom, accessed August 5, 2025, https://designmom.com/lds-church-baptism-policy-reversal/
44. Are Mormon Baptisms Valid? | Catholic Answers Q&A, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.catholic.com/qa/are-mormon-baptisms-valid
45. Statement by the Catholic Church on the LDS Mormon church – A Christian Review of Bad Religions and Beliefs, accessed August 5, 2025, https://truthandgrace.com/Catholiconmormon.htm
46. Response on the validity of baptism conferred by «mormons» – The Holy See, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010605_battesimo_mormoni_en.html
47. Vatican ruling on Mormon baptism clarifies Catholic practice …, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.archbalt.org/vatican-ruling-on-mormon-baptism-clarifies-catholic-practice/
48. The Vatican does not view the Mormon church as Christian. LDS baptisms are not considered valid by the Catholic Church. “Mormons hold that there is no real Trinity, no original sin, [and] that Christ did not institute baptism.” – Reddit, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/mormon/comments/aq5m0p/the_vatican_does_not_view_the_mormon_church_as/
49. Question of Validity of Baptism Conferred in Church of Jesus Christ …, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/question-of-validity-of-baptism-conferred-in-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latterday-saints-10098
50. Where is the proper source that the Catholic Church does not recognize LDS (Mormons) baptism? – Quora, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.quora.com/Where-is-the-proper-source-that-the-Catholic-Church-does-not-recognize-LDS-Mormons-baptism
51. The Question of the Validity of Baptism conferred in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints – The Holy See, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010605_battesimo_mormoni-ladaria_en.html
52. Responses to Question Regarding Baptism with Formula Using “We Baptize” | EWTN, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/responses-to-question-regarding-baptism-with-formula-using-we-baptize-23457
53. The Provenance of Mormon Baptism – Site Archives – Times & Seasons, accessed August 5, 2025, https://archive.timesandseasons.org/2016/02/the-provenance-of-mormon-baptism/index.html
54. Response of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith about the Validity of Baptism conferred in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints by Fr Urbano Navarrete, S.J. – The Holy See, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010605_battesimo_mormoni-navarrete_en.html
55. Is Mormonism Christian? – BYU Studies, accessed August 5, 2025, https://byustudies.byu.edu/article/is-mormonism-christian-reflections-on-a-complicated-question
56. Interfaith Relations, accessed August 5, 2025, https://news-ie.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/interfaith-relations
57. Interfaith Efforts of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/interfaith
58. Helping & Caring for Those in Need – The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accessed August 5, 2025, https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/serve/caring?lang=eng
59. Catholic and Latter-day Saint Humanitarian Partnerships, accessed August 5, 2025, https://law.nd.edu/assets/435619/humanitarian_partner_overview.pdf
60. Interfaith Relations – Church Newsroom, accessed August 5, 2025, https://news-ph.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/interfaith-relations